Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Martinez et al v. Davis et al
as 1:2022cv05913
Plaintiff:
Pedro Martinez
Defendant:
Barbara A. Davis, K. Rupert, McCoy and others
Intervenor:
C. NORRIS LAW GROUP, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Garcia v. Davis et al
as 1:2019cv07130
Defendant:
Barbara Davis, Anna Jiminez, Cermak Health Services of Cook County and others
Plaintiff:
Joe Garcia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nevarez v. Dart et al
as 1:2019cv04786
Plaintiff:
Valente Nevarez
Defendant:
Anna Jiminez, Cermak Health Services of Cook County, C.C.D.O.C. Officers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv06778
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
De Los Santos v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2018cv00427
Plaintiff:
Alyssa De Los Santos
Defendant:
City of Chicago, E. Jiminez, M. Renteria and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Founders Insurance Co. v. Adams Associates, et al.
as 1:2015cv09828
Plaintiff:
Founders Insurance Co.
Defendant:
Adams Associates , Candice Adams, Tammy M Bond and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Meyers v. Buck et al
as 1:2013cv04787
Plaintiff:
Anthony Meyers
Defendant:
Buck , Jiminez , Rios and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Jiminez et al v. Gresk et al
as 1:2012cv01870
Plaintiff:
Margarita Jiminez and Robert Sandberg
Defendant:
Michael J Gresk , Tom Mouhelis , John K Rutledge and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Jiminez v. Gemini Development Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv02452
Defendant:
Gemini Development Group, Inc. and Bryan Carlton
Plaintiff:
Edith Jiminez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv05215
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
