Cases 11 - 20 of 82
Lane v. Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC et al
as 3:2022pq01259
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Plaintiff:
Micky Lane
Defendant:
Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC, Syngenta AG and Chevron U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Clervrain et al v. Jeffreys et al
as 3:2022cv00571
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain, Fridelyne Maisoneuve, Roselaine Clerval and others
Defendant:
Rob Jeffreys, Shelith Hansbro, Michael R. Lane and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lane et al v. Syngenta Crop Protection LLC et al
as 3:2022pq00315
Plaintiff:
Robert P. Lane and Roberta Lane
Defendant:
Syngenta Crop Protection LLC and Syngenta AG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Lane et al
as 3:2022pq00314
Plaintiff:
Robert P. Lane and Roberta Lane
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Clark v. Wexford Health Sources et al
as 3:2021cv01695
Plaintiff:
Ramon Clark
Defendant:
Wexford Health Sources, Vipin Shah, David Poor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lane v. Sproul
as 3:2021cv01692
Petitioner:
Mark Alan Lane
Respondent:
D. Sproul
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Lane et al v. Syngenta AG et al
as 3:2021pq01538
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Plaintiff:
Dennis Lane and Judy Lane
Defendant:
Syngenta AG, Syngenta Crop Protection LLC and Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Stinde v. Thompson et al
as 3:2021cv01108
Plaintiff:
Raymond Stinde
Defendant:
Scott Thompson, C/O Doer, C/O Tomshack and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Warren v. Lane et al
as 3:2021cv00538
Defendant:
L. Lane and Lt. McCarthy
Plaintiff:
Frederick Warren
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fulford v. Heatherly et al
as 3:2021cv00365
Plaintiff:
Amos Fulford
Defendant:
S. Benton, Administrative Review Board, S. Lane and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
