Cases 11 - 20 of 37
Hubert et al v. A.W. Chesterton Company et al
as 3:2015cv00617
Defendant:
A.W. Chesterton Company, AERCO International, Inc., Air and Liquid Systems Corp. and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Dale Hubert and Patrica Hubert
Cross_claimant:
Velan Valve Corporation , General Electric Company , ITT Corporation and others
Cross_defendant:
A.W. Chesterton Company, AERCO International, Inc., API Heat Transfer, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Tucker et al v. AERCO International, Inc. et al
as 3:2015cv00304
Plaintiff:
Joe Donald Tucker and Cora May Tucker
Defendant:
AERCO International, Inc., All Acquisitions, LLC, Air & Liquid Systems Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Nesser et al v. Advanced Composites Group et al
as 3:2014cv01367
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Nesser and Karen Nesser
Defendant:
Advanced Composites Group, AERCO International, Inc., Allied Manfacturing, Inc. and others
Cross_defendant:
General Electric Company , AERCO International, Inc., Advanced Composites Group and others
Cross_claimant:
ITT Corporation and Crane Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Madaris et al v. Adel Wiggins, Inc. et al
as 3:2014cv01223
Defendant:
Adel Wiggins, Inc., Bucyrus International, Inc., Dana Companies, LLC. and others
Counter Defendant:
Flowserve Corp., Ameron International Corporation, Buffalo Pumps, Inc. and others
Cross Defendant:
Lear Siegler Diversified Holding, Inc., Borgwagner Morse Tec, Inc., Hysol and others
Cross Claimant:
Ingersoll Rand Company and General Electric Company
Plaintiff:
James E Madaris, Jr and Sandra S Madaris
Counter Claimant:
Industrial Holding Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
McKoy v. United States of America
as 3:2014cv00698
Petitioner:
Sterling McKoy
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Sterling v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 3:2014cv50545
Plaintiff:
Christopher Sterling
Defendant:
Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kieffer-Moseley v. Air & Liquid System Corporation et al
as 3:2013cv01313
Plaintiff:
Delores J Kieffer-Moseley and Delores J Kiefer-Moseley
Defendant:
Air & Liquid System Corporation , Air Products and Chemicals, Inc., Armstrong International Inc and others
Cross_claimant:
Georgia-Pacific Corporation , Industrial Holding Corporation , Ingersoll-Rand Company and others
Cross_defendant:
Georgia-Pacific Corporation , Air & Liquid System Corporation , Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Fulwider v. AERCO International, Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv01220
Counter Defendant:
Ameron International Corporation, The Dow Chemical Company, Research-Cottrell, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Welco Manufacturing Company, Brand Insulations, Inc., Young Insulation Group of St. Louis, Inc. and others
Cross Claimant:
General Cable Industries, Inc., AERCO International, Inc., Vanderbilt Minerals, LLC and others
Cross Defendant:
Dap, Inc., Ralph Lewis Fulwider, Crane Company and others
Counter Claimant:
Grimes Aerospace Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Mohler v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation et al
as 3:2013cv01221
Defendant:
Sunoco, Inc. (R&M), Welco Manufacturing Company, Murco Wall Products, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Elaine Mohler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Shewmake v. AERCO International, Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv01223
Cross Defendant:
Rockwell Automation, Inc., Crane Company, Beazer East, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Welco Manufacturing Company, Brand Insulations, Inc., Young Insulation Group of St. Louis, Inc. and others
Cross Claimant:
General Cable Industries, Inc., AERCO International, Inc., Vanderbilt Minerals, LLC and others
Counter Defendant:
Helen Pearl Shewmake
Counter Claimant:
Grimes Aerospace Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
