Cases 21 - 30 of 35
Brokaw v. Chief Administrative Officer
as 3:2019cv01031
Respondent:
Chief Administrative Officer
Petitioner:
Benjamin John Brokaw
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Donald v. Warden et al
as 3:2019cv00992
Plaintiff:
Carey B. Donald
Defendant:
Warden, Chief Administrative Officer and Medical Director
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brownlee v. Yates et al
as 3:2019cv00774
Defendant:
Chief Administrative Officer, Dylan Yates and C/O Kennedy
Plaintiff:
Demaro Brownlee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Baxter et al
as 3:2019cv00131
Plaintiff:
Antoine Johnson
Defendant:
Chief of Police of East St. Louis, Alvin Park, East St. Louis Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bolden v. Chief Administrative Officer et al
as 3:2018cv02197
Defendant:
John Doe, Lt. Clark, Major Pitts and others
Plaintiff:
Angenai Bolden and Anjenai Bolden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Terry v. Illinois Department of Corr. (IDOC) et al
as 3:2018cv01711
Defendant:
S. Simpson, Vandalia Correctional Center, Adjustment Committee (Adj. Comm.) of VCC and others
Plaintiff:
Corky Terry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCuan v. Campanella et al
as 3:2016cv00605
Plaintiff:
John McCuan
Defendant:
Judge Campanella, Judge Campanella's Son, Judge Phillip Palmer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reyes-Pena v. Chief Commander of the United States et al
as 3:2014cv00815
Plaintiff:
Manuel Reyes-Pena
Defendant:
Chief Commander of the United States, Vice President and Unknown Party
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Harrington et al
as 3:2013cv00900
Plaintiff:
Jimmie Smith
Defendant:
Rick Harrington, Chief Administrative Officers, Betsy Spiller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Andrews v. State of Illinois et al
as 3:2013cv00593
Plaintiff:
Corey Andrews
Defendant:
State of Illinois, Sheriff Bond County, Chief Deputy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
