Cases 61 - 70 of 3,471
Whitfield El v. Latulip et al
as 2:2024cv00059
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Whitfield El and Lawrence Whitfield
Defendant:
Matthew Latulip, Marce Gonzalez Jr., Warden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Powers-Ivey v. Harris
as 3:2024cv00134
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Powers-Ivey and Tyrone Powres-Ivey
Defendant:
R Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taebel v. Flynn
as 2:2024cv00049
Plaintiff:
Mitch Taebel
Defendant:
Elizabeth A. Flynn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00047
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Merta v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
as 2:2024cv00046
Plaintiff:
DONNA MERTA
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Cochran v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00121
Petitioner:
Michael J Cochran, Sr and Michael Cochran, Sr
Respondent:
Warden
Not Yet Classified:
INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kasmark v. Lakeshore Railcar & Tanker Services, LLC
as 2:2024cv00041
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND KASMARK
Defendant:
LAKESHORE RAILCAR & TANKER SERVICES, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Harris v. Miles
as 3:2024cv00105
Plaintiff:
Brian Harris
Defendant:
Miles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Myers v. Banic et al
as 3:2024cv00109
Plaintiff:
Michael Myers and Michael R Myers, Jr
Defendant:
Banic and Laporte Co Sherriffs Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Myers v. St Joseph County Jail et al
as 3:2024cv00110
Plaintiff:
Michael Myers and Michael R Myers, Jr
Defendant:
St Joseph County Jail and South Bend City of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
