Cases 11 - 20 of 40
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00194
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Grandison v. Life Treatment Center
as 3:2020cv00170
Defendant:
Life Treatment Center
Plaintiff:
Phillip Wade Grandison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wade El v. Galipeau et al
as 3:2019cv00831
Plaintiff:
Sadat Aaron Wade El and Sadat Aaron Wade
Defendant:
Galipeau and Dr Liaw
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
IMO 2019 Attorney Mass Suspension
as 2:2019mc00090
In Re:
Danuta B. Panich, Kenneth L. Sales, Scott J. Lennox and others
Matlock v. Sevier et al
as 3:2019cv00376
Plaintiff:
Barry W Matlock and Barry Wade Matlock
Defendant:
Greg Sheward, Indiana Department of Environmental Management, Captain Earhardt and others
Not Yet Classified:
WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Matlock v. Lewis et al
as 3:2019cv00202
Plaintiff:
Barry W Matlock and Barry Wade Matlock
Defendant:
Jody Kupferberg, Officer McKinney, Wexford of Indiana and others
Not Yet Classified:
WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv00103
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Matlock v. Porter et al
as 3:2018cv01007
Defendant:
Yancy, Critiren, Flake and others
Undetermined:
WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Plaintiff:
Barry W Matlock and Barry Wade Matlock
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nicholson et al v. Gary City of et al
as 2:2018cv00257
Plaintiff:
Douglas Grimes, Jeff Nicholson, Greg Serbon and others
Defendant:
Herbert Jr Smith, Lavetta Sparks-Wade, Carolyn D Rogers and others
Intervenor:
Indiana State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Wade v. Gary City of et al
as 2:2018cv00139
Plaintiff:
Shawn Wade
Defendant:
Gary City of and Gerald Richardson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
