Cases 11 - 20 of 34
Cottrell v. Bowen et al
as 3:2019cv00695
Plaintiff:
David William Boone Cottrell and David Cottrell
Defendant:
Tami Napier, Robert O Bowen and E. Nelson Chipman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00261
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Sanders v. Bowen et al
as 3:2019cv00328
Defendant:
Henry, C Stobaugh and Charles Bowen
Plaintiff:
Michael A Sanders
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dodson et al v. Bowen et al
as 3:2019cv00054
Defendant:
Tami Napier, Robert O Bowen and Nelson E Chipman, Jr
Plaintiff:
Tara Shanna Dodson and Connie Sue Dodson
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2381
Dodson v. Bowen et al
as 3:2019cv00007
Defendant:
Tami Napier, Robert O Bowen and Nelson E Chipman, Jr
Plaintiff:
Connie Sue Dodson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hegwood v. Indiana Parole Board Members et al
as 3:2018cv00554
Plaintiff:
Michael A Hegwood
Defendant:
Mr Butts, Indiana Parole Board Members, Charles Bowens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perez v. The Otis R. Bowen Center for Human Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv00205
Plaintiff:
Pedro Perez
Defendant:
Officer J. James, Officer C. Harruff, The Otis R. Bowen Center for Human Services, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holl v. Otis R Bowen Center for Human Services Inc
as 3:2018cv00002
Plaintiff:
Ryan Anthony Holl
Defendant:
Otis R Bowen Center for Human Services Inc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Northwest Indiana Painters Welfare Fund et al v. Bowen's Decorating Service Inc
as 2:2016cv00007
Plaintiff:
Northwest Indiana Local 460 District Council 91, IUPAT, AFL-CIO , Jim Loftis , James Mitchell, Sr and others
Defendant:
Bowen's Decorating Service Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00139
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
