Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Rogers v. Hogan et al
as 2:2018cv00010
Plaintiff:
Karla Linett Rogers
Defendant:
Robert Hogan and Dianna Morrow
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carter-Lawson v. Millennia Housing Management, LTD et al
as 2:2017cv00277
Plaintiff:
Carmen Carter-Lawson
Defendant:
Millennia Housing Management, LTD, Letoya Morrow and Kenneth Sharkey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daniels v. Logansport Indiana City of et al
as 3:2016cv00709
Plaintiff:
Todd Daniels
Defendant:
Logansport Indiana City of , Adam Morrow and Flaude Dillon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv00035
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Kenfield et al v. Biomet Orthopedics LLC et al
as 3:2013cv00711
Plaintiff:
Vernon K Kenfield and Kimberlee C Morrow
Defendant:
Biomet Orthopedics LLC , Biomet US Reconstruction LLC , Biomet Manufacturing Corp and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Morrow v. Superintendent
as 3:2013cv00520
Petitioner:
Eric D Morrow
Respondent:
Superintendent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Grandberry-Morrow v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc et al
as 3:2012cv00214
Plaintiff:
Lorita Grandberry-Morrow
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics Inc, DePuy Inc, DePuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Morrow v Indiana State of
as 4:2010cv00062
Plaintiff:
Eric D Morrow
Defendant:
Indiana State of, Melissa Kohne, Denise Saxton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morrow v. Barnes et al
as 4:2010cv00053
Plaintiff:
ERIC D. MORROW
Defendant:
Sean Barnes, JAMES COLLIER, Denise Saxton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Restricted Filer v. Wilson et al
as 3:2009cv00099
Plaintiff:
Larry T Outlaw
Defendant:
William K Wilson, J Shreves, Lt Burkett and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
