Cases 71 - 80 of 40,903
Treadwell v. Walkerton Police Department
as 3:2024cv00226
Plaintiff:
Tanishia Treadwell
Defendant:
Walkerton Police Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
McPherson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00189
Plaintiff:
Monte McPherson
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (RSI)
Rogers v. Lott
as 3:2024cv00376
Plaintiff:
Tiger A Rogers
Defendant:
Lott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hammond City of et al v. ASARCO Master Inc
as 2:2024cv00096
Plaintiff:
City of Hammond, Indiana, City of Whiting, Indiana, Hammond City of and others
Defendant:
ASARCO MASTER, INC. and ASARCO Master Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 6972 Resource Conservation and Recovery Act
Newton v. Neal
as 3:2024cv00248
Plaintiff:
Larry Warren Newton, Jr
Defendant:
Ron Neal
Not Yet Classified:
INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tweedy v. Heeg et al
as 3:2024cv00257
Plaintiff:
Blake Tweedy
Defendant:
Ron Heeg and Quality Correctional Care LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hawkins v. Mawhorr et al
as 1:2024cv00188
Plaintiff:
Kameron Hawkins
Defendant:
Adams County Sheriff Dan Mawhorr, Conrad Dyer, Cody Givens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hayes v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00184
Plaintiff:
Rochelle Hayes
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Fadavi v. Ginn
as 4:2024cv00040
Plaintiff:
Faraz Fadavi Akhavan Bonab
Defendant:
Samuel Ginn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Smith v. Bradford-Scott Data, LLC
as 1:2024cv00187
Plaintiff:
Mark Smith
Defendant:
Bradford-Scott Data, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
