Cases 51 - 60 of 149
ADAMS v. DONAHUE et al
as 1:2008cv00137
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER LEWIS ADAMS
Defendant:
DAVID DONAHUE, ED BUSS, C. WHELAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
STAFFORD v. COX et al
as 1:2008cv00072
Plaintiff:
JAMES BLAIR STAFFORD
Defendant:
UNION COUNTY CIRCUIT JUDGE MATHEW R. COX, UNION COUNTY PROSECUTOR RONALD JORDAN, DEPUTY PROSECUTOR KATHY KOLGER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
OLMSTEAD v. CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2008cv00029
Plaintiff:
JODY OLMSTEAD
Defendant:
CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA, CONWAY, LITTLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HAYES v. CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS et al
as 1:2008cv00006
Plaintiff:
PHILLIP HAYES
Defendant:
CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS, C. MAHER, F. VANEK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PARKS v. MAXIE et al
as 1:2008cv00005
Plaintiff:
WARREN E. PARKS
Defendant:
DALE MAXIE and STEVEN COX
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HILL v. INDIANA STATE POLICE et al
as 1:2007cv01625
Plaintiff:
ALLEN CRAIG HILL
Defendant:
INDIANA STATE POLICE, SHERIFF 2006 and LUTHER BLANTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MULLIN v. MITCHELL et al
as 1:2007cv01569
Plaintiff:
KEVIN P. MULLIN
Defendant:
MARK MITCHELL, M.J. FORSYTHE and TINA HATFIELD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MAIDEN v. FORSYTHE et al
as 1:2007cv01524
Plaintiff:
JAMES RANDALL MAIDEN
Defendant:
JASON FORSYTHE and TEENA HATFIELD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JUSTICE v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 1:2007cv01512
Plaintiff:
CHARLES E. JUSTICE
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JUSTISE v. TAYLOR et al
as 1:2007cv01420
Plaintiff:
CHARLES E. JUSTISE, SR.
Defendant:
TAYLOR and FRANK ANDERSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
