Cases 31 - 40 of 720
K.M. et al v. ROBISON et al
as 1:2021cv02469
Plaintiff:
K. M. and WILLIAM MACKIE
Defendant:
SCOTT ROBISON, DEBBIE UNGAR, MICHAEL COUSSENS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
CLARKSVILLE MINISTRIES, LLC. v. TOWN OF CLARKSVILLE, INDIANA et al
as 4:2021cv00135
Plaintiff:
CLARKSVILLE MINISTRIES, LLC
Defendant:
TOWN OF CLARKSVILLE, INDIANA, TOWN OF CLARKSVILLE BUILDING COMMISSION and RICK BARR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DEMERIT v. VELTON
as 1:2021cv02288
Plaintiff:
JOHN DEMERIT
Defendant:
OFFICER JOHN VELTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
OZIER v. CITY OF JEFFERSONVILLE et al
as 4:2021cv00125
Plaintiff:
KELVIN OZIER
Defendant:
INDIANA CITY OF JEFFERSONVILLE, NIKOLAI BOYAR, Chief KENNY KAVANAUGH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BAY v. CRAIG et al
as 4:2021cv00124
Plaintiff:
EDWARD R BAY
Defendant:
SAM CRAIG, BRANDON WOODWARD and MISTY ADAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
EL v. STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 1:2021cv02199
Plaintiff:
CHEYOU EL
Defendant:
STATE OF INDIANA, KROGER, INC, CPS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BUNCH v. RAINEY et al
as 1:2021cv02085
Plaintiff:
APRIL BUNCH
Defendant:
SCOTT RAINEY, FOUNTAIN COUNTY, IND.* TOWN OF HILLSBORO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RAKES v. ROEDERER et al
as 4:2021cv00114
Plaintiff:
AMANDA RAKES
Defendant:
JONATHAN ROEDERER, TE'JUAN JOHNSON, THE ESTATE OF TE'JUAN JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JACKSON et al v. SALLEE et al
as 4:2021cv00106
Plaintiff:
KAYLEE JACKSON and DUSTIN JACKSON
Defendant:
WILLIAM SALLEE, CITY OF MITCHELL, INDIANA and THE CITY OF MITCHELL, INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NAUGLE v. WHEELER et al
as 4:2021cv00105
Plaintiff:
BRAD S. NAUGLE and BRAD NAUGLE
Defendant:
OFFICER NATALIE K. BOLING, SALEM POLICE DEPARTMENT, OFFICER TERRY J. WHEELER, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
