Cases 111 - 120 of 9,785
ROEHRMAN v. MCAFEE, LLC, et al.
as 1:2022cv01568
Plaintiff:
THOMAS ROEHRMAN
Defendant:
MCAFEE, LLC and PROTECTED.NET GROUP LIMITED, d/b/a TOTAL AV
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
SCHWARTZ v. KILROY'S NORTH AMERICA, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv01563
Plaintiff:
ELIJAH SCHWARTZ
Defendant:
KILROY'S NORTH AMERICA, LLC, KILROY'S SPORTS, LLC and KILROY'S ON KIRKWOOD, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
FREEMAN v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2022cv01544
Plaintiff:
ASHELY L. FREEMAN
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. $20,015.00 UNITED STATES CURRENCY
as 1:2022cv01543
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
$20,015.00 UNITED STATES CURRENCY
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
HUBBELL v. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE et al
as 1:2022cv01562
Plaintiff:
JASON HUBBELL
Defendant:
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE and YOLANDA CHAMBERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BALLING v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2022cv01554
Plaintiff:
DONALD J. BALLING
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
EDWARDS v. WELLS
as 1:2022cv01550
Plaintiff:
JAMEL J. EDWARDS
Defendant:
WELLS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RAHMAAN v. PRUITT et al
as 1:2022cv01545
Plaintiff:
ABDUL-KHAALIQ S. RAHMAAN
Defendant:
DANIELLE PRUITT, SCOTT CHAPMAN, MATHEW KELLY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DANIELS v. SOLOMON et al
as 1:2022cv01541
Plaintiff:
RA'MAR DANIELS
Defendant:
T. SOLOMON, J. D. BALLENGER, C. WARGNY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RAHMAAN v. BRADBURY et al
as 1:2022cv01548
Plaintiff:
ABDUL-KHAALIQ SHAHEED RAHMAAN
Defendant:
JARROD BRADBURY, SCOTT CHAPMAN, MATHEW KELLY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
