Cases 41 - 50 of 3,939
PIRANT v. STATE OF INDIANA
as 1:2023cv02290
Petitioner:
JAMIL M. PIRANT
Respondent:
STATE OF INDIANA
Defendant:
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
CHAMBERS v. MONROE COUNTY CT. et al
as 1:2023cv02281
Petitioner:
MICHAEL S. CHAMBERS
Respondent:
MONROE COUNTY CT., JUDGE (TERESA HARPER), ATT. (STUART BAGGERLY) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BANKHEAD v. ERNEST et al
as 1:2023cv02268
Plaintiff:
ACTORA MECONN BANKHEAD
Defendant:
J. ERNEST, J. JACKSON and BROWN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
STITTS v. WALLEN et al
as 1:2023cv02253
Plaintiff:
TURAMA STITTS
Defendant:
WALLEN and PENDLETON CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BROADWAY v. RULE
as 2:2023cv00571
Petitioner:
MARCUS BROADWAY
Respondent:
T. RULE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
SMITH v. RULE
as 2:2023cv00568
Petitioner:
MARCUS SMITH
Respondent:
T. RULE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
MCGINNIS v. MANNING et al
as 1:2023cv02242
Plaintiff:
ZACHARY J. MCGINNIS
Defendant:
MANNING, MCCAFFERTY, BALL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
VILCHUCK v. REAGLE
as 1:2023cv02243
Plaintiff:
SETH VILCHUCK
Defendant:
DENNIS REAGLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ISENHOWER v. QUALITY CORRECTIONAL CARE et al
as 1:2023cv02228
Plaintiff:
BRIAN RUSSELL ISENHOWER
Defendant:
QUALITY CORRECTIONAL CARE, NEIL PROPST, LORA DEATON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
NOEL v. USA
as 1:2023cv02222
Petitioner:
KEVIN NOEL
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
