Cases 1 - 10 of 1,747
HEFFERN v. STATE OF INDIANA
as 2:2017cv00410
Respondent:
DICK BROWN and STATE OF INDIANA
Petitioner:
MICHAEL P. HEFFERN
Miscellaneou:
WVCF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BLACKWELL v. TRUEBLOOD et al
as 2:2017cv00407
Plaintiff:
KEITH L. BLACKWELL
Defendant:
S. JULIAN, HEATHER MATA, E. TRUEBLOOD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
PIERCE v. KNIGHT
as 1:2017cv02900
Respondent:
WENDY KNIGHT
Petitioner:
KEVIN PIERCE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
X v. KRUEGER
as 2:2017cv00400
Respondent:
J. E. KRUEGER
Petitioner:
CLAUDE X
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
JOHNSON v. SUPERINTENDENT
as 2:2017cv00397
Petitioner:
JAMES JOHNSON
Miscellaneou:
PUTNAMVILLE CF (Court Use Only)
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WINTERS v. KREUGER
as 2:2017cv00386
Respondent:
JEFFREY KREUGER
Petitioner:
MICHAEL JOSIAH WINTERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
BOYD v. SUPERINTENDENT
as 1:2017cv02734
Petitioner:
ENOCSHA BOYD
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HEADEN v. BROWN
as 2:2017cv00377
Respondent:
RICHARD BROWN
Petitioner:
JAMAL HEADEN
Miscellaneou:
WVCF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
KYNER v. LOVERIDGE et al
as 2:2017cv00373
Defendant:
N. DAVIS, JANE DOE, JOHN DOE and others
Plaintiff:
CHRIS KYNER
Miscellaneou:
WVCF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BOWMAN v. STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 1:2017cv02585
Defendant:
DUANE ALSIP, LAURA R BEDKIN, ANDREW COLE and others
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN G. BOWMAN
Miscellaneou:
PENDLETON CF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.