Cases 51 - 60 of 1,747
COOK v. SMITH
as 2:2017cv00184
Petitioner:
ARCINE COOK
Miscellaneou:
PUTNAMVILLE CF (Court Use Only)
Respondent:
BRIAN SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
PEEK v. JULIAN
as 2:2017cv00183
Respondent:
S. JULIAN
Petitioner:
WILLIAM PEEK
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
GEARNHARDT v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2017cv00186
Plaintiff:
JOHN P. GEARNHARDT
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674 Federal Tort Claims Act
BARNETT v. SUPERINTENDENT
as 1:2017cv01262
Petitioner:
REYMOND BARNETT
Miscellaneou:
PLAINFIELD CF (Court Use Only)
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HALL v. DANIELS
as 2:2017cv00176
Respondent:
CHARLES DANIELS
Petitioner:
ORLANDO CORDIA HALL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
CRAIG v. BROWN
as 2:2017cv00177
Respondent:
RICHARD BROWN
Petitioner:
LARRY CRAIG
Miscellaneou:
WVCF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SCHWARTZ v. ZATECKY
as 1:2017cv01160
Miscellaneou:
PENDLETON CF (Court Use Only)
Petitioner:
THEODORE T. SCHWARTZ
Respondent:
DUSHAN ZATECKY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ANNAMALAI v. JULIAN
as 2:2017cv00163
Petitioner:
ANNAMALAI ANNAMALAI
Respondent:
STEVEN JULIAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
DEAN v. SUPERINTENDENT, PUTNAMVILLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 2:2017cv00161
Plaintiff:
IRWIN DEAN
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT, PUTNAMVILLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Religious Land Use & Institutionalized Persons Act of 2000
HAYES v. BERRY et al
as 2:2017cv00160
Defendant:
BERRY, BOLT, CHAIFIN and others
Plaintiff:
GREGORY HAYES
Miscellaneou:
PUTNAMVILLE CF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
