Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana Before Judge Mark Dinsmore
Cases 41 - 50 of 3,414
DAY v. WARDEN
as 2:2024cv00076
Petitioner: CHRISTINA DAY
Respondent: WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MARCHANT v. CENTURION HEALTH SERVICES et al
as 2:2024cv00075
Plaintiff: AUTUMN MARCHANT
Defendant: CENTURION HEALTH SERVICES, AMELIA BRUNER, CHRISTINA NUDI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BENNETT v. BORDEN et al
as 2:2024cv00071
Plaintiff: KEVIN BENNETT
Defendant: TYLER BORDEN, BARRETT and NOAH MILLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HANKTON v. WADDS
as 2:2024cv00067
Petitioner: ALKHALIQ HANKTON
Respondent: WADDS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
FORD v. MURRAY
as 2:2024cv00063
Plaintiff: BILLY EUGENE FORD
Defendant: JOHN MURRAY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SMITH v. SMALL et al
as 2:2024cv00058
Plaintiff: CORY MARTEZ SMITH
Defendant: GARY SMALL, JESSICA RICHARDSON, CASSANDRA POPE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROBERTSON v. KNIGHT et al
as 1:2024cv00295
Plaintiff: TIMOTHY ROBERTSON
Defendant: WENDY KNIGHT, ANDREW COLE, SCHEPPER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FURMAN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2024cv00052
Plaintiff: REX FURMAN
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674 Federal Tort Claims Act
NEATHERY v. REAGLE et al
as 1:2024cv00246
Plaintiff: AUSTIN NOAH NEATHERY
Defendant: CHRISTINA REAGLE, DENNIS REAGLE, ANDREW COLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MASCHO v. WARDEN
as 1:2024cv00241
Petitioner: ADRIAN MASCHO
Respondent: WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?