Cases 71 - 80 of 3,013
WILLIAMS v. JOSEPH et al
as 1:2024cv00190
Plaintiff:
BILLY WILLIAMS
Defendant:
JOSEPH and RIGGLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SUMMAGE v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
as 2:2024cv00041
Plaintiff:
KERWIN SUMMAGE
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
WALTERS v. FORRESTAL et al
as 1:2024cv00202
Plaintiff:
LANCE W. WALTERS
Defendant:
KERRY J. FORRESTAL, TRINITY FOOD SERVICES GROUP, H. SOLAJA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KREILEIN v. SEVIER
as 1:2024cv00185
Petitioner:
ALAN KREILEIN
Respondent:
MARK SEVIER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WHITE v. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF INDIANA
as 1:2024cv00184
Petitioner:
RAYMOND C. WHITE
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WHITE v. NKEMAKOLOM et al
as 1:2024cv00186
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND CURTHEL WHITE
Defendant:
NKEMAKOLOM, L. VAN, OMALEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BARNUM v. KNIGHT et al
as 1:2024cv00158
Plaintiff:
DEANDRE BARNUM
Defendant:
WENDY KNIGHT, HALL and DEPOSKI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. VANIHEL
as 1:2024cv00140
Petitioner:
KENDALL JOHNSON
Respondent:
FRANK VANIHEL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SCHONABAUM v. VANDERBURGH COUNTY CONFINEMENT CENTER et al
as 3:2024cv00017
Plaintiff:
DAVID A. SCHONABAUM
Defendant:
VANDERBURGH COUNTY CONFINEMENT CENTER, PAYNE, COBBS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCCAMMON v. GUTLING et al
as 3:2024cv00015
Plaintiff:
SHANE ALLEN MCCAMMON
Defendant:
GUTLING, WOODS, TITUS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
