Cases 21 - 30 of 1,594
MAXEY v. POTTER et al
as 1:2024cv00320
Plaintiff:
VANCE GERALD MAXEY
Defendant:
BRENT POTTER, DOYLE & FOUTTY, U S BANK N A and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00317
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
RUBY v. STILLER et al
as 4:2024cv00033
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL R. RUBY
Defendant:
CARRIE STILLER, WILLIAM GRAY, AMANDA C. KELLY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00301
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
ARNOLD v. BRADFORD et al
as 1:2024cv00261
Plaintiff:
ROBERT F. ARNOLD, JR.
Defendant:
DANIELLE BRADFORD, TAYLOR BAUGH, JEFFREY PEASE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00021
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00233
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00197
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00200
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
LOWE v. SOUNDVIEW MANAGEMENT GROUP, LLC et al
as 4:2024cv00014
Plaintiff:
BRIAN LOWE
Defendant:
SOUNDVIEW MANAGEMENT GROUP, LLLC, STONECREST APARTMENTS, LP and SOUNDVIEW MANAGEMENT GROUP, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
