Cases 1 - 10 of 2,484
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00794
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Violation of Due Process and Equal Protection
WIRTSHAFTER et al v. THE TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY et al
as 1:2024cv00754
Plaintiff:
JASPER WIRTSHAFTER, BENJAMIN ROBINSON, Ph.D. and MADELEINE MELDRUM
Defendant:
THE TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY and PAMELA WHITTEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00721
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
HARDEN v. CHARLES A. TINDLEY ACCELERATED SCHOOLS et al
as 1:2024cv00732
Plaintiff:
SHAYNE HARDEN
Defendant:
CHARLES A. TINDLEY ACCELERATED SCHOOLS, INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION and TAMI TAYLOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00708
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
STACY v. DELAWARE COUNTY SHERIFF
as 1:2024cv00705
Plaintiff:
KYLE LEE STACY
Defendant:
DELAWARE COUNTY SHERIFF
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SHELTON v. STATE OF INDIANA, DEPARTMENT OF CHILD SERVICES FOSTER CARE UNIT
as 1:2024cv00707
Plaintiff:
FELICIA Y. SHELTON
Defendant:
STATE OF INDIANA, DEPARTMENT OF CHILD SERVICES FOSTER CARE UNIT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
GOMEZ v. MARSHALL
as 1:2024cv00670
Plaintiff:
LUIS GOMEZ
Defendant:
L MARSHALL ID # 44402
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00673
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
AYERS v. CALLAHAN et al
as 1:2024cv00653
Plaintiff:
JARON AYERS
Defendant:
BLAKE CALLAHAN and TOWN OF CHESTERFIELD, IN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
