Civil Rights Cases filed in the US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana Before Judge Tim Baker
Cases 11 - 20 of 2,488
GOMEZ v. MARSHALL
as 1:2024cv00670
Plaintiff: LUIS GOMEZ
Defendant: L MARSHALL ID # 44402
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00673
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
AYERS v. CALLAHAN et al
as 1:2024cv00653
Plaintiff: JARON AYERS
Defendant: BLAKE CALLAHAN and TOWN OF CHESTERFIELD, IN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
GREGORY v. WHITE COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT et al
as 1:2024cv00613
Plaintiff: ISAAC WILLIAM GREGORY
Defendant: WHITE COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT, BRAD WOOLEY, LAURA COSGRAY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
GENE B. GLICK, INC v. ROLLERSON
as 1:2024cv00584
Plaintiff: GENE B. GLICK, INC
Defendant: ANITA ROLLERSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00537
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00527
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00519
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00485
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
ALLEN v. MORGAN COUNTY INDIANA et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2024cv00456
Plaintiff: CHERYL D. ALLEN
Defendant: MORGAN COUNTY INDIANA, IU MEDICAL CENTERS OF IN and CENTER STONE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?