Cases 41 - 50 of 2,519
AYERS v. CALLAHAN et al
as 1:2024cv00653
Plaintiff:
JARON AYERS
Defendant:
BLAKE CALLAHAN and TOWN OF CHESTERFIELD, IN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
GREGORY v. WHITE COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT et al
as 1:2024cv00613
Plaintiff:
ISAAC WILLIAM GREGORY
Defendant:
WHITE COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT, BRAD WOOLEY, LAURA COSGRAY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00527
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00519
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00485
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
ALLEN v. MORGAN COUNTY INDIANA et al
as 1:2024cv00456
Plaintiff:
CHERYL D. ALLEN
Defendant:
MORGAN COUNTY INDIANA, IU MEDICAL CENTERS OF IN and CENTER STONE
ESTATE OF KATHARINE SARANAM JOHNSTON v. FLOYD COUNTY INDIANA et al
as 1:2024cv00427
Plaintiff:
ESTATE OF KATHARINE SARANAM JOHNSTON
Defendant:
FLOYD COUNTY INDIANA, FLOYD COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT, DAN FOREMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00673
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00537
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00420
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
