Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana Before Judge Tim Baker
Cases 1 - 10 of 3,344
PEREZ v. REAGLE
as 1:2024cv00755
Petitioner: OSCAR PEREZ
Respondent: CHRISTINA REAGLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BUTLER v. GEO GROUP INC. et al
as 1:2024cv00744
Plaintiff: KENNEDY EUGENE BUTLER
Defendant: GEO GROUP INC., MARK SEVIER and BRILES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROYAL v. STATE OF INDIANA
as 1:2024cv00738
Petitioner: DENAR ROYAL
Respondent: STATE OF INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
STACY v. TEMPLE et al
as 1:2024cv00712
Plaintiff: WILLIAM RICHARD STACY
Defendant: DYLAN TEMPLE, TEMPLE, SANDERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BRANDON v. HUMPHREY et al
as 1:2024cv00406
Plaintiff: JEREMY BRANDON
Defendant: HUMPHREY, GUINN and BOSTOCK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ANDERSON v. WARDEN
as 1:2024cv00701
Petitioner: DARRYL LINEAR ANDERSON
Respondent: WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
PITTS v. WARDEN
as 1:2024cv00391
Petitioner: KENDAL PITTS
Respondent: WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
RINKER v. ARAMARK CORRECTIONAL SERVICES, INC. et al
as 1:2024cv00700
Plaintiff: ADONIS ROBERT RINKER
Defendant: ARAMARK CORRECTIONAL SERVICES, INC., MICHAEL CECIL, BRIDGEMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TRIPP v. JAIL COMMANDER et al
as 1:2024cv00376
Plaintiff: TERRY W. TRIPP
Defendant: JAIL COMMANDER, WELPATH HEALTHCARE SERV., WELPATH NURSES (UNKNOWN) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
THOMAS v. FORESTAL et al
as 1:2024cv00446
Plaintiff: JOHN ERIC THOMAS
Defendant: KERRY J. FORESTAL, FEMI, JANE DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?