Cases 1 - 10 of 1,511
GARY v. INDIANA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2024cv00378
Plaintiff:
LOREN D. GARY
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS, CHRISTINA REAGLE and DENNIS REAGLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BENNETT v. HICKS
as 2:2024cv00070
Plaintiff:
KEVIN BENNETT
Defendant:
MICHAEL HICKS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BENNETT v. BORDEN et al
as 2:2024cv00071
Plaintiff:
KEVIN BENNETT
Defendant:
TYLER BORDEN, BARRETT and NOAH MILLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GARY v. INDIANA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2024cv00315
Plaintiff:
LOREN D. GRAY and LOREN D. GARY
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS, CHRISTINA REAGLE and DENNIS REAGLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RICHARDSON v. SNOWDEN et al
as 2:2024cv00056
Plaintiff:
TREY RICHARDSON
Defendant:
SARAH SNOWDEN, BRANDY LEEK, ANTHONY BONDS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GRIFFIN v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 2:2024cv00053
Plaintiff:
JERAMIAH J. GRIFFIN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, FCC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
WEBB v. MCCAFFERTY et al
as 1:2024cv00269
Plaintiff:
MERLE ROSS WEBB
Defendant:
KELLY MCCAFFERTY, ARAYANNA MOSS and AKILAH LAMAR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COLLINS v. SMITH
as 2:2024cv00048
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL S. COUSINS and MICHAEL S. COLLINS
Defendant:
MARK SMITH, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TORAN v. RANDOLPH et al
as 2:2024cv00044
Plaintiff:
MILES TORAN
Defendant:
ISSAC RANDOLPH, CARLA COAKLEY, MADISEN GILBERT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FLORES v. FINCH et al
as 1:2024cv00215
Plaintiff:
HECTOR FLORES, JR.
Defendant:
FINCH and HACKMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
