Cases 1 - 10 of 1,798
HOPKINS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2024cv00824
Petitioner:
ANTOINE HOPKINS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
THOMPSON v. CENTURION HEALTH SERVICES, LLP et al
as 1:2024cv00809
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS THOMPSON
Defendant:
CENTURION HEALTH SERVICES, LLP, MICHAEL MITCHEFF, DUAN PIERCE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BROWN v. DIVISION OF INDIANA
as 1:2024cv00790
Petitioner:
JAMES MICHAEL BROWN
Respondent:
DIVISION OF INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
COOKE v. MILLER et al
as 4:2024cv00062
Plaintiff:
SAMANTHA COOKE
Defendant:
SHERIFF BRENT MILLER, CHIEF DEPUTY BRADLEY SHEPHERD, JAIL COMMANDER BRADLEY SEACAT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GABALDON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2024cv00767
Plaintiff:
FRANK GABALDON
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674 Federal Tort Claims Act
AYON v. FOSTER et al
as 1:2024cv00756
Plaintiff:
MANUEL GARCIA AYON, JR.
Defendant:
FOSTER, AFOLAYAN, BISHOP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FEY v. WASHINGTON et al
as 4:2024cv00061
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR WAYNE FEY
Defendant:
WASHINGTON and STEVE BUSH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SCUDDER v. WARDEN
as 1:2024cv00677
Petitioner:
TAMMY J. SCUDDER
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
WIGGINTON v. GEO GROUP, INC. et al
as 1:2024cv00675
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN WIGGINTON
Defendant:
GEO GROUP, INC., MARK SEVIER, CENTURION HEALTH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HOOD v. ODELL
as 1:2024cv00663
Plaintiff:
DERRICK L. HOOD
Defendant:
SAMUEL ODELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
