Cases 1 - 10 of 53
COLE v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2019cv00365
Defendant:
H. CHRISTIAN DEBUYN, DAVID DONAHUE, J. WYNN and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN C. COLE, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CARUTHERS v. CLARK COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2014cv00342
Defendant:
R. BROWN, CLARK COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT, DANIEL DONAHUE and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT O. CARUTHERS, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KERN v. STATE OF INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2010cv00379
Defendant:
DOC Commissioner EDWIN BUSS, Commissioner (Res) J. DAVID DONAHUE, Classification Dir. GARY HARTSOCK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HAMLET v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2009cv00384
Plaintiff:
KEVIN D. HAMLET
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, EDWIN BUSS, WENDY KNIGHT and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
GRAY v. HALL et al
as 1:2008cv01296
Plaintiff:
LUTHER GRAY
Defendant:
REV. STEPHEN HALL, EDWIN G. BASS, ARAMARK and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
ISLAMIC COMMUNITY AT CORRECTIONAL INDUSTRIAL FACILITY v. SCHAFER, JR. et al
as 1:2008cv01159
Plaintiff:
ISLAMIC COMMUNITY AT CORRECTIONAL INDUSTRIAL FACILITY
Defendant:
ROBERT M. SCHAFER, JR., TOM HANLON, J. DAVID DONAHUE and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
STOUT v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION et al
as 1:2008cv01091
Plaintiff:
CLARENCE STOUT
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, J.D. DONAHUE, MARC SEVIER and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
FRITZ v. DONAHUE
as 2:2008cv00323
Respondent:
J. DAVID DONAHUE
Petitioner:
DENNIS FRITZ
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
MURPHY v. DONAHUE et al
as 2:2008cv00311
Plaintiff:
ROBERT MURPHY
Defendant:
J.D. DONAHUE, MICHAEL OSBURN, MR. HIGGIN and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
TAYLOR v. DONAHUE et al
as 2:2008cv00231
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH A. TAYLOR
Defendant:
J. DAVID DONAHUE and JIM WYNN
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
