Cases 21 - 30 of 178
TERHUNE et al v. PITT et al
as 3:2022cv00177
Plaintiff:
GERALD TERHUNE and THERESA SPERRY
Defendant:
NATHAN PITT, JACQUELINE A. DUFF, CORY OFFERMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02163
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
HILL v. GAMBILL et al
as 2:2022cv00443
Plaintiff:
JAMES K. HILL
Defendant:
HUNTER GAMBILL, JOHNNIE BOHNERT, JOSH CLARKE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01823
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
PATEL v. THE UNITED STATES
as 1:2022cv01576
Plaintiff:
THE EXCELLENT THE EXCELLENT RAJ. K. PATEL
Defendant:
THE UNITED STATES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SCHROEDER et al v. CITY OF WASHINGTON, INDIANA et al
as 3:2022cv00115
Plaintiff:
THOMAS J SCHROEDER and ERICA L SCHROEDER
Defendant:
CITY OF WASHINGTON, INDIANA, L T Doane, A M Guzman and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00104
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act
PATEL v. THE UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME DU LAC
as 1:2022cv01329
Plaintiff:
RAJ K. PATEL
Defendant:
UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME DU LAC and THE UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME DU LAC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DOYLE v. SCHERSCHEL
as 1:2022cv01116
Plaintiff:
PATRICK EVAN DAVID DOYLE
Defendant:
JOSHUA K. SCHERSCHEL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01097
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
