Cases 31 - 40 of 55
THOMPSON v. CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS et al
as 1:2015cv01712
Defendant:
MARK BRITTON, WILLIAM BUECKERS, BRIAN BURNETT and others
Plaintiff:
BILLIE THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv01692
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
PHILLIPS v. U.S EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSIONS et al
as 1:2015cv01657
Plaintiff:
JERRY D. PHILLIPS
Defendant:
STEWART & STEWART LAW FIRM, SUS DIE CAST PRODUCTS INC. and U.S EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00132
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
WATSON v. POLLARD-PHILLIPS et al
as 1:2015cv01167
Defendant:
IU HEALTH and NATYSHATI POLLARD-PHILLIPS
Plaintiff:
DEBRA WATSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
PHILLIPS v. WILKERSON et al
as 1:2015cv00151
Defendant:
CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS, INDIANAPOLIS METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT, JOHN DOE and others
Plaintiff:
NATHAN PHILLIPS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2015cv00007
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv01266
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv01735
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
STORMS v. FLOYD COUNTY INDIANA et al
as 4:2013cv00143
Defendant:
ROBERT ARCHIBALD, KEISHA BROOKS, ETHAN BROWN and others
Plaintiff:
ASHLEY STORMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
