Civil Rights Cases filed in the US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Cases 1 - 10 of 12
RealtyLink LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00989
Plaintiff: RealtyLink LLC and IN Lebanon John Shaw LLC
Defendant: City of Lebanon, Dick Robertson, John Copeland and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
PUGH v. COBB et al
as 2:2021cv00256
Defendant: TED ROBERTSON and T.A COBB
Plaintiff: MATTHEW BRYANT PUGH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PUGH v. COBB et al
as 3:2021cv00094
Defendant: TED ROBERTSON and T.A COBB
Plaintiff: MATTHEW BRYANT PUGH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROBERTSON v. CITY OF WESTFIELD
as 1:2019cv00566
Defendant: CITY OF WESTFIELD
Plaintiff: JULIANA ROBERTSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
AMERICAN HOMELAND TITLE AGENCY, INC. et al v. ROBERTSON We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2015cv02059
Plaintiff: AMERICAN HOMELAND TITLE AGENCY, INC., MARTIN RINK and JOHN YONAS
Defendant: STEPHEN W. ROBERTSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv00106
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00816
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 791 Job Discrimination (Rehabilitation Act)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00420
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
BROWN v. ROKITA et al
as 1:2008cv01484
Plaintiff: DRAMETRA BROWN
Defendant: TODD ROKITA, TODD ROKITA, J. BRADLEY KING and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Civil Rights None
ROBERTSON v. DANIELS et al
as 1:2008cv01279
Plaintiff: JUSTIN D. ROBERTSON
Defendant: MITCH DANIELS, ATTORNEY GENERAL STEVE CARTER and JAMES W. PAYNE
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Civil Rights None

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?