Cases 1 - 10 of 54
UNITED STATES et al v. COUNTY OF MARION et al
as 1:2023cv01907
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES and ERIC D. DYCUS, JR.
Defendant:
COUNTY OF MARION, KENNETH S. COOKE, JENEA N. MCNEAL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Violation of Due Process and Equal Protection
DAVIS II v. IFGB, LLC d/b/a FIVE GUY'S BURGERS AND FRIES et al
as 1:2023cv01683
Plaintiff:
Richard Davis II and RICHARD DAVIS, II
Defendant:
IFGB, LLC, Miracle Ricketts, Shawn Cook and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00585
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00029
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv02541
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12132
BOWES-NORTHERN v. COOK COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT et al
as 1:2021cv02343
Plaintiff:
SHEDRICK BOWES-NORTHERN
Defendant:
COOK COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT, COOK COUNTY STATE ATTORNEY OFFICE, MARKHAM POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 dp
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2020cv00215
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
MONTERO v. CITY OF MUNCIE et al
as 1:2020cv01375
Defendant:
CHIEF OF POLICE JOSEPH WINKLE, ZACHARY OSBORN, CHASE HUNTER and others
Plaintiff:
EMANUEL MONTERO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NA MAIN STREET LLC et al v. COOK et al
as 1:2020cv01335
Plaintiff:
EARL F HAMM, JR, AFI VENTURES LLC, TAD THOMAS and others
Defendant:
ERIC HOLCOLM, DAVID COOK, CURTIS HILL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv04580
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
