Cases 1 - 10 of 110
SPEECH FIRST, INC v. WHITTEN et al
as 1:2024cv00898
Plaintiff:
SPEECH FIRST, INC
Defendant:
PAMELA WHITTEN, LAMAR HYLTON, KATHY ADAMS RIESTER and others
REAMER v. MITCHELL
as 1:2024cv00559
Plaintiff:
ADAM REAMER
Defendant:
BRADEN MITCHELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WARREN v. GOVERNOR OF THE STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 1:2023cv02047
Defendant:
GOVERNOR OF THE STATE OF INDIANA, GREG HOLCUMB, INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CHILD SERVICES and others
Plaintiff:
JOCELYN WARREN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01634
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00099
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 203 Equal Pay Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00643
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1681 Title IX Educational Amendments - Sex Discrimination
LEE et al v. MISCHLER et al
as 2:2023cv00010
Plaintiff:
ADAM L. LEE and DENISE J. FASIG
Defendant:
DUEL CLAIM, ANN SMITH MISCHLER and SULLIVAN COUNTY INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
TRIPLETT JR v. RIESTER
as 1:2022cv02489
Plaintiff:
DARRIS DERNARD TRIPLETT JR
Defendant:
KATHY ADAMS RIESTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 dp Civil Rights - Denial of Due Process
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01654
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
SHANE G., INC. et al v. VAN ROOY PROPERTIES, INC. et al
as 1:2022cv01330
Plaintiff:
SHANE G., INC. d/b/a THE LIVING ROOM LOUNGE, DEANN GROSS and MICHELLE VILES
Defendant:
VAN ROOY PROPERTIES, INC., MARSHALL A ADAMS and MARSHALL A. ADAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 ra Race Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
