Cases 1 - 10 of 15
REINOEHL v. MERRILL et al
as 1:2022cv01974
Plaintiff:
JENNIFER REINOEHL
Defendant:
JOHN MERRILL, KATIE M. HOBBS, ALEJANDRO PADILLA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
CHANLEY v. CITY OF EVANSVILLE INDIANA et al
as 3:2021cv00155
Plaintiff:
KRISTI CHANLEY
Defendant:
CITY OF EVANSVILLE INDIANA, MARIO REID, CODY SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv00109
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
LEARD v. GOODWILL OF CENTRAL AND SOUTHERN INDIANA, INC. et al
as 1:2021cv01413
Defendant:
GOODWILL OF CENTRAL AND SOUTHERN INDIANA, INC., JOSEPH H. HOGSETT, Board of Directors of The Excel Center, L.L.C. and others
Plaintiff:
Dionne Leard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GANNOM v. WINKLE et al
as 1:2020cv02362
Defendant:
MATT MCCONNELL, COREY POSEY, CHASE HUNTER and others
Plaintiff:
LONNIE E GANNOM and LONNIE E. GANNOM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MONTERO v. CITY OF MUNCIE et al
as 1:2020cv01375
Defendant:
CHIEF OF POLICE JOSEPH WINKLE, ZACHARY OSBORN, CHASE HUNTER and others
Plaintiff:
EMANUEL MONTERO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SUTTON v. CITY OF CLINTON, INDIANA et al
as 2:2020cv00042
Defendant:
JOHN ALKIRE, COUNTY OF PARKE, INDIANA, COREY HUTCHINS and others
Plaintiff:
RICKY L. SUTTON, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GARNER v. SMITH
as 1:2019cv02072
Plaintiff:
NICHOLIS COREY GARNER
Defendant:
BRADLEY SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv01897
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
MAN v. SKAGGS et al
as 1:2015cv02073
Defendant:
CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER, WHITNEY COOPER, DEPARTMENT OF CHILD SERVICES and others
Plaintiff:
MAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
