Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00071
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1681 Title IX Educational Amendments - Sex Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00005
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 ad Job Discrimination (Disability Act)
PAYTON et al v. WALSH et al
as 1:2021cv02817
Plaintiff:
JULIA REAGAN, JOSHUA FREDERICK, JACQUELINE HUBER and others
Defendant:
MARTIN J. WALSH and ASCENSION ST. VINCENT HOSPITAL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
TURNER v. BRAZIL CITY POLICE DEPT. et al
as 2:2021cv00384
Plaintiff:
DENNIS WAYNE TURNER
Defendant:
BRAZIL CITY POLICE DEPT., CASEY HARDER and CLINT MCQUEEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
EVE et al v. BURTRON et al
as 1:2021cv01721
Defendant:
WESTFIELD POLICE DEPARTMENT, JOEL RUSH, CITY OF WESTFIELD and others
Plaintiff:
ASHLEY KINCAID EVE and CASEY WILSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv03085
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROWNING v. CITY OF MT. VERNON et al
as 3:2017cv00012
Plaintiff:
ROBERT BROWNING
Defendant:
CITY OF MT. VERNON, COUNTY OF POSEY COUNTY, MT. VERNON POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00206
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00205
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv03411
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Miscellaneou:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
