Cases 1 - 9 of 9
HMUNG v. SCHENCK et al
as 1:2023cv01253
Plaintiff:
STEVEN HMUNG and NGUN HMUNG
Defendant:
OFFICER SCHENCK, LIEUTENANT JAMES PRIOR, SARGENT BANDY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
SMITH v. CITY OF KOKOMO, INDIANA et al
as 1:2021cv02035
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA PHILLIP SMITH
Defendant:
CITY OF KOKOMO, INDIANA, DOUGLAS STOUT, CARY JACOBS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MONTERO v. CITY OF MUNCIE et al
as 1:2020cv01375
Defendant:
CHIEF OF POLICE JOSEPH WINKLE, ZACHARY OSBORN, CHASE HUNTER and others
Plaintiff:
EMANUEL MONTERO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STUMM et al v. TOWN OF PITTSBORO
as 1:2017cv04296
Plaintiff:
BRIAN T HELMER, JASON A STUMM and MATTHEW W STUMM
Defendant:
LIEUTENANT SCOTT KING, CHRISTI PATTERSON, TOWN OF PITTSBORO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
JOHNSON v. CORIZON, LLC et al
as 1:2017cv02400
Defendant:
SERGEANTS (NAMES UNKNOWN), CORIZON, LLC, JANE DOE #1 and others
Plaintiff:
KEYTRON JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILDE v. ROSENBERG et al
as 1:2015cv01051
Defendant:
JAMES ALOISIO, CALLNET CALL CENTER SERVICES INC., CRAIG DENISON and others
Plaintiff:
SHELLA WILDE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WISE et al v. LAYTON et al
as 1:2012cv01169
Defendant:
Sheriff JOHN R. LAYTON, Chief Deputy EVA TALLEY-SANDERS and Lieutenant Colonel GARY TINGLE
Plaintiff:
DARYL WISE and ERIKA WISE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HULL v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION et al
as 1:2011cv00353
Plaintiff:
ZACHARY HULL
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION and LIEUTENANT O. THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LEACH v. STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 1:2007cv01376
Plaintiff:
GABRIEL LEACH
Defendant:
STATE OF INDIANA, STATE OF INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, THE GEO GROUP, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
