Cases 1 - 10 of 16
COLLIER et al v. AT HOME STORES, LLC
as 1:2024cv00077
Plaintiff:
Tatiana Collier, Patrina Peterson and Lucretia Collier
Defendant:
At Home Stores, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01908
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
SCUTERI v. BURTON et al
as 2:2023cv00110
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ANDREW SCUTERI
Defendant:
AMANDA K BURTON, JOHN A LARSON, GREG GRIMMET and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
JENNINGS v. HOLCOMB et al
as 1:2022cv00690
Plaintiff:
LEON JENNINGS
Defendant:
ERIC HOLCOMB, GWENDOLYN HORTH, KRISTINE JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2020cv00169
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
ROBINSON et al v. PETERSON et al
as 1:2019cv00589
Defendant:
THE CONSOLIDATED CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS AND MARION COUNTY, JOHN DOE, JONATHAN HORLOCK and others
Plaintiff:
GLORIA CLOUD and DOROTHY ROBINSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv02186
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
HILL v. DUNN et al
as 1:2016cv00691
Defendant:
HARRY C. DUNN and FLOYD PETERSON
Plaintiff:
A'DARRIUS HILL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv02050
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
MARSHALL v. INDIANA UNIVERSITY et al
as 1:2015cv00726
Defendant:
CHAD AHREN, MARIA HINTON, INDIANA UNIVERSITY and others
Plaintiff:
JEREMIAH MARSHALL
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1681 Title IX Educational Amendments - Sex Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
