Cases 101 - 110 of 455
SIMS v. VANSCHOYCK et al
as 2:2021cv00230
Defendant:
KELLY INDA, SHAKEFER, BENNETH and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN SIMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MILLER v. FALCONER et al
as 1:2021cv01305
Defendant:
WEXFORD OF INDIANA, Mr. JACKSON, Mr. NEMORE and others
Plaintiff:
NOAH MICHAEL MILLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HOLLINGSWORTH v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION et al
as 2:2021cv00205
Defendant:
MIKE RAINS d/b/a, Putnamville Correctional Facility, Deputy Warden, TODD ROKITA d/b/a, Indiana Attorney General, ERIC HOLCOMB d/b/a, Governor and others
Plaintiff:
SHAQUILLE HOLLINGSWORTH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCQUAY v. GILMORE et al
as 2:2021cv00182
Defendant:
STEVEN C. CARPENTER, AMBER SENDMYER, RANDALL VANVLEET and others
Plaintiff:
LEONARD B. MCQUAY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
AHMED v. U.S. DEPT. OF JUSTICE et al
as 2:2021cv00178
Respondent:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, B. LAMMER and U.S. DEPT. OF JUSTICE
Petitioner:
FAROOQUE AHMED
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
NISSLEY et al v. THE GEO GROUP, INC. et al
as 1:2021cv00880
Defendant:
C. HARPER, A. NEAL, WEXFORD OF INDIANA, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
KELLY NISSLEY and STEVEN NISSLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RODRIGUEZ v. MARTZ et al
as 1:2021cv00843
Defendant:
D. ALSIP, T. HOWARD, JACKSON and others
Plaintiff:
THADDEUS RODRIGUEZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CERVANTES v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION et al
as 1:2021cv00736
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION and B. BOWEN
Plaintiff:
JOSE CERVANTES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
UNDERWOOD v. CONYERS et al
as 1:2021cv00685
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER UNDERWOOD
Defendant:
ARAMARK, COMMANDER, B. MARTZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HAYES v. ZATECKY et al
as 1:2021cv00630
Defendant:
MATLOCK, T. TURNER, M. CARTER and others
Plaintiff:
QUINTERO HAYES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
