Cases 11 - 20 of 180
CRAIG v. MEANS et al
as 1:2023cv02088
Plaintiff:
HOLDEN ANTHONY CRAIG
Defendant:
KALA ANN MEANS, JEREMY TODD MULL, JEFFREY K. BRANSTETTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ORR v. CENTURION HEALTH et al
as 1:2023cv02034
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ORR
Defendant:
CENTURION HEALTH, CHRISTINA REAGLE, ROBERT CARTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CLARK v. DAVIESS COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT et al
as 3:2023cv00189
Plaintiff:
CODY LEE CLARK
Defendant:
DAVIESS COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT, QUALITY CORRECTIONAL CARE, DO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARTIN v. BEDWELL et al
as 2:2023cv00511
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY MARTIN
Defendant:
SARAH BEDWELL, BOBBI RIGGS, MARY BETH RUTH-SIMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ORR v. HOLCOMB et al
as 1:2023cv01831
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ORR
Defendant:
ERIC HOLCOMB, CHRISTINA REAGLE, ROBERT CARTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RUMLER v. CENTURION MEDICAL et al
as 2:2023cv00465
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN LEE RUMLER
Defendant:
CENTURION MEDICAL, KIM HOSSON, S. BEDWELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. KALLIE et al
as 2:2023cv00422
Plaintiff:
MARK B. JOHNSON
Defendant:
S. KALLIE, GEO GROUP, LIEUTENANT CLARK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARTIN v. ACKERS et al
as 2:2023cv00384
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY MARTIN
Defendant:
ACKERS, ERIC HILL, DOWNING and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00340
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LINTZ v. CLARKE
as 2:2023cv00297
Plaintiff:
DAKOTA LINTZ
Defendant:
SARAH CLARKE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
