Cases 11 - 20 of 39
CURRY v. USA
as 2:2019cv00425
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
ARTHUR J. CURRY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
DAVIDSON v. JONES et al
as 1:2019cv02550
Defendant:
CHANCE HOLMES, SEAN JONES, CHUCK CURRY and others
Plaintiff:
JASON DAVIDSON, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SCOTT v. CLARK COUNTY SHERIFF
as 1:2019cv02529
Defendant:
DANIELS, WEBBER, BRADLEY JACOBS and others
Plaintiff:
KENNETH L. SCOTT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ALLEN v. HAGENMAIER et al
as 1:2018cv03654
Defendant:
MATT ANGLEMEYER, MARION COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE, SHANNON LOGSDON and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLES ALVIN ALLEN, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ALLEN v. CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS et al
as 1:2018cv02625
Defendant:
MATT ANGLEMEYER, SHANNON LOGSDON, ROBYN MORGAN and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLES ALVIN ALLEN, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HAMLET v. CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS et al
as 2:2017cv00574
Defendant:
CITY CORPORATION OF MARION COUNTY, CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS, TERRY R. CURRY and others
Former Dep. Pro:
ABIGAIL GRANTSTEIN
Plaintiff:
KEVIN D. HAMLET
Miscellaneou:
PUTNAMVILLE CF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
YOUNG v. CURRY et al
as 1:2017cv03425
Defendant:
TERRY R. CURRY, SHATRESE M. FLOWERS and INDIANAPOLIS S.W.A.T. UNIT, METRO DRUG TASK FORCE
Plaintiff:
JEROME A. YOUNG
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RONDEAU v. CURRY
as 1:2017cv01047
Defendant:
TERRY R. CURRY
Miscellaneou:
PENDLETON CF (Court Use Only)
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER RONDEAU
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CURRY v. GEHRKE et al
as 1:2016cv02969
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL CURRY
Defendant:
DOUGLAS GEHRKE, GRIEVANCE COORDINATOR OFFICER, HESTAND and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ANKH EL v. STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 1:2016cv00852
Plaintiff:
MENES ANKH EL
Defendant:
SHEILA CARLISLE, TERRY CURRY, DANIEL HARRISON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
