Cases 11 - 20 of 115
JONES v. SLOWN et al
as 3:2023cv00089
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR LEE JONES, IV
Defendant:
L. SLOWN, K. LEEK, NOAH ROBINSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROBINSON v. WARDEN
as 3:2023cv00080
Petitioner:
CHRISTOPHER RAY ROBINSON
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ROBINSON v. COCHRAN et al
as 1:2023cv00561
Plaintiff:
JUAN ROBINSON
Defendant:
R. COCHRAN, D. REAGLE, A. SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROBINSON v. LIEDTK et al
as 1:2023cv00362
Plaintiff:
JUAN ROBINSON
Defendant:
LIEDTK, WEXFORD LLC/CENTURION, REAGEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROBINSON v. SUPERINTENDENT MIAMI CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 1:2023cv00033
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL T. ROBINSON
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT MIAMI CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ROBINSON v. SUPERINTENDENT MIAMI CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 1:2023cv00034
Petitioner:
MICHAEL T. ROBINSON
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT MIAMI CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
STITTS v. O'CONNER
as 1:2022cv02116
Plaintiff:
TURAMA STITTS
Defendant:
ROBINSON O'CONNOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MICKLES v. ADAMS REAL ESTATE et al
as 2:2022cv00400
Plaintiff:
TERRELL MICKLES
Defendant:
ADAMS REAL ESTATE, GOLDEN OAKS REAL ESTATE, BRETT ROBINSON REAL ESTATE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
ROBINSON v. REGALE et al
as 1:2022cv01675
Plaintiff:
JUAN ROBINSON
Defendant:
D. REGALE, A. SMITH, FAIR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BOZELL v. STILLAHOWER et al
as 1:2022cv01512
Plaintiff:
DAVID BOZELL
Defendant:
TYLER STILLAHOWER, SAMUEL ROBINSON, SHAYLA HEAGY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
