Cases 31 - 40 of 171
BURKES v. RICHARDSON et al
as 2:2023cv00015
Plaintiff:
JABARI BURKES
Defendant:
RICHARSON, WHITE, PHILLIPS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WHITE v. DECKER et al
as 1:2022cv02405
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM A WHITE
Defendant:
ROBERT KENNETH DECKER, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
PARGO v. WHITE et al
as 2:2022cv00507
Plaintiff:
TORREY PARGO
Defendant:
WHITE and HILL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARTIN v. VANIHEL et al
as 2:2022cv00470
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY MARTIN
Defendant:
FRANK VANIHEL, KEVIN GILMORE, THOMAS WELLINGTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
YEANAY v. BRANCHVILLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 3:2022cv00162
Plaintiff:
MARKUS YEANAY
Defendant:
BRANCHVILLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY and WHITE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CONNER v. STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 1:2022cv01933
Plaintiff:
GARY M. CONNER
Defendant:
STATE OF INDIANA, BILL BROOKS, DON MUNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BISHOP v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2022cv01927
Plaintiff:
JEREMY ANDREW BISHOP
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, GEO GROUP, INC., J. JONES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WHITE v. SMITH et al
as 1:2022cv01885
Plaintiff:
DE'AUNTAYE WHITE
Defendant:
AARON SMITH, ARNOLD, BOOKOUT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WHITE v. WARDEN OF PENDLETON et al
as 1:2022cv01903
Plaintiff:
FABIAN WHITE
Defendant:
WARDEN OF PENDLETON and LIEDTKE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BLANKENSHIP v. WHITE et al
as 1:2022cv01891
Plaintiff:
ANDREW J. BLANKENSHIP
Defendant:
WHITE and KRULL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
