Cases 1 - 10 of 10
PARKER v. HARLOW et. al
as 1:2021cv01343
Defendant:
CURT ENGERT, DONNA HARLOW, DEBRA DOTSON and others
Plaintiff:
JOHNNIE PARKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DOTSON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2021cv00007
Petitioner:
ANDRAE DOTSON
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
DOTSON v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION et al
as 1:2020cv03191
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, PABLO M. PEREZ, MICHAEL MITCHEFF and others
Plaintiff:
SHAWN R. DOTSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
THOMAS et al v. LEMMON et al
as 2:2015cv00408
Defendant:
DWAYNE ALSIP, LINDA S. ASHBY, DANIEL ATWOOD and others
Plaintiff:
LEONARD D. THOMAS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
THOMAS v. LEMMON et al
as 2:2015cv00399
Defendant:
DWYANE ALSIP, DANIEL ARNOLD, LINDA ASHBY and others
Plaintiff:
LEONARD THOMAS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KNIGHTEN v. PERSON et al
as 2:2015cv00386
Defendant:
DOTSON, MONICA GIBSON, JESSICA HAMMACH and others
Plaintiff:
UNDRAY KNIGHTEN
Miscellaneou:
WVCF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DOTSON v. USA
as 1:2014cv01648
Petitioner:
STEVEN DOTSON
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
CUNNINGHAM v. TERRE HAUTE POLICE DEPT. et al
as 1:2012cv01279
Defendant:
TERRE HAUTE MAYOR K. BURK, CHIEF OF POLICE, SEG. DOTSON and others
Plaintiff:
RICHARD CUNNINGHAM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DOTSON v. KNIGHT
as 2:2012cv00068
Petitioner:
TONY DOTSON
Respondent:
STANLEY KNIGHT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DOTSON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2007cv00822
Petitioner:
JONATHAN DOTSON
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
