Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00177
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
ELLIS v. KNIGHT et al
as 1:2023cv00984
Plaintiff:
DEMAJIO JEROME ELLIS
Defendant:
WENDY KNIGHT, CENTURION HEALTH OF INDIANA, GOBBER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DUKE v. COOK et al
as 1:2020cv02440
Defendant:
WARDEN, COOK and SCREENING OFFICER OF
Plaintiff:
MARK A. DUKE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DUKE v. KNIGHT
as 1:2020cv02207
Respondent:
WENDY KNIGHT
Petitioner:
MARK DUKE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
PATEL v. SESSIONS, et al
as 2:2017cv00420
Respondent:
CLAY COUNTY SHERIFF, ELAINE C. DUKE, RACHEL MONTGOMERY and others
Petitioner:
ALKABEN PATEL
Interested Party:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
JOHNSON v. HUNT
as 1:2017cv02608
Defendant:
JAMES HUNT
Plaintiff:
RANDOLL DUKE JOHNSON, JR
Miscellaneou:
WESTVILLE E-FILE(COURT USE ONLY)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KONRATH v. CLOSE et al
as 1:2017cv00009
Defendant:
DEB CLOSE, BETH DAUGHERTY, DUKES MEMORIAL HOSPITAL and others
Plaintiff:
GREGORY KONRATH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. HUNT
as 1:2014cv01962
Defendant:
JAMES HUNT
Plaintiff:
RANDOLL DUKE JOHNSON, JR
Miscellaneou:
WESTVILLE CF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ODOM v. HILAND et al
as 1:2014cv01014
Defendant:
ALAN BROWN, JAMIE CARAWAY, JOEL DUNLAP and others
Plaintiff:
GLENN D. ODOM, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DUKE v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 2:2012cv00276
Petitioner:
CHAD E. DUKE
Respondent:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and SUPERINTENDENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
