Cases 1 - 10 of 10
MCCULLAH v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2022cv00365
Plaintiff:
JOHN JAVILLO MCCULLAH
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, T. J. WATSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
WAGNER v. STATE OF INDIANA
as 3:2022cv00030
Petitioner:
THOMAS FRANK WAGNER
Respondent:
STATE OF INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BERRY et al v. CARTER et al
as 1:2022cv00340
Plaintiff:
EARLIE B.A. BERRY, JR.
Defendant:
ROBERT E. CARTER, ARAMARK FOOD SERVICE, BRANDON PHERSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CHAPPELL v. RHODES et al
as 2:2020cv00686
Defendant:
UNKNOWN FCI DENTIST, RHODES and VAN WAGNER
Plaintiff:
BRYAN COLBY CHAPPELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
JORDAN et al v. PHERSON et al
as 2:2020cv00021
Defendant:
KEITH HARTZELL, BRANDON PHERSON and BELINDA WAGNER
Plaintiff:
LENELL JORDAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WAGNER v. BOTTOMS
as 3:2019cv00124
Defendant:
TIM BOTTOMS
Plaintiff:
DONDI WAGNER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WAGNER v. MARTIN et al
as 3:2019cv00072
Defendant:
DARRYL CHAMBERLAIN, T. MARTIN, TIM BOTTOMS and others
Plaintiff:
DONDI WAGNER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WAGNER v. KNIGHT
as 2:2013cv00416
Respondent:
STANLEY KNIGHT
Petitioner:
PAUL EUGENE WAGNER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JAMES v. GEO GROUP, INC. et al
as 1:2009cv01204
Plaintiff:
THOMAS M. JAMES
Defendant:
GEO GROUP, INC., JEFFREY WRIGLES, CMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LAHR, SR. v. HANLON et al
as 1:2007cv00531
Plaintiff:
RANDALL I. LAHR, SR.
Defendant:
THOMAS HANLON, DAVID SGT. JENKINS, MICHEAL LAFABIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
