Cases 101 - 110 of 329
MCCLURE v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2023cv00414
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER MCCLURE
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CHRISTINA REAGLE, JAMES BASINGER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARTIN v. SIMMERMAN et al
as 2:2023cv00385
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY MARTIN
Defendant:
SIMMERMAN, MARK SMITH, CHRISTOPHER HOLCOMB and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARTIN v. ACKERS et al
as 2:2023cv00384
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY MARTIN
Defendant:
ACKERS, ERIC HILL, DOWNING and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARTIN v. ARNOLD et al
as 2:2023cv00379
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY MARTIN
Defendant:
ARNOLD, MARK SMITH JR, ASHBA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SCUTERI v. REAGLE et al
as 2:2023cv00361
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ANDREW SCUTERI
Defendant:
CHRISTINE REAGLE, RAINES, PHEGLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RUSSELL v. KIJAKAZI
as 2:2023cv00311
Plaintiff:
RICHARD P. RUSSELL
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
BEST v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2023cv07042
Plaintiff:
RUSSELL BEST, JR.
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL INCORPORATED, COOK GROUP INCORPORATED and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
RUSSELL v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2023cv01038
Plaintiff:
L. DONNA RUSSELL and DONNA L. RUSSELL
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
HARRIS v. BASHFORD
as 1:2023cv00999
Plaintiff:
RUSSELL TIMOTHY HARRIS
Defendant:
SHEILAH BASHFORD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00645
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
