Cases filed in the US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Cases 161 - 170 of 528
JONES v. LOOP
as 4:2019cv00280
Respondent: FRANK LOOP
Petitioner: FREDERICK D. JONES, SR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
JOHNSON v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2019cv04981
Defendant: COOK MEDICAL, LLC, COOK INCORPORATED and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Plaintiff: JEFFREY JORDAN JOHNSON, SR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RAGLAND v. WARDEN
as 1:2019cv04991
Respondent: WARDEN
Petitioner: GREGORY C. RAGLAND, SR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
CANTU v. INDIANA PAROLE BOARD et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv00608
Respondent: CURTIS HILL, JR., INDIANA PAROLE BOARD and INDIANA DEPT. OF CORRECTION
Petitioner: ANTONIO CANTU, SR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
PERRY v. ZATECKY et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv04916
Plaintiff: RODNEY S. PERRY, SR.
Defendant: DUSHAN ZATECKY, B. RICHEY and A. TEMPLETON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TOWNSEND, SR. v. WILKIE
as 1:2019cv04905
Plaintiff: LOUIS E. TOWNSEND, SR.
Defendant: ROBERT WILKIE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
NATHAN v. WATSON We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv00605
Respondent: T. WATSON
Petitioner: TYRONE NATHAN, SR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
LOOPER v. SAUL We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv04627
Plaintiff: MICHAEL W. LOOPER SR. and MICHAEL W. LOOPER, SR.
Defendant: ANDREW M. SAUL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00233
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
FOLEY v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2019cv04552
Defendant: COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Plaintiff: ELMORRIS FOLEY and ELMORRIS FOLEY, SR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?