Cases 11 - 20 of 511
JACKSON v. I.D.O.C. et al
as 2:2024cv00137
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM CLAYTON JACKSON
Defendant:
I.D.O.C., WABASH VALLEY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, F. VANIHEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00397
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
JACKSON v. I.D.O.C et al
as 2:2024cv00128
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM CLAYTON JACKSON
Defendant:
I.D.O.C, FRANK VANIHEL and WABASH VALLEY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HARTING v. MADISON COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2024cv00237
Plaintiff:
DEBORAH HARTING
Defendant:
MADISON COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT, TYLER JUGG, JONATHAN GRIMES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ELDER v. CRST EXPEDITED, INC. et al
as 1:2024cv00349
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER ELDER
Defendant:
CRST EXPEDITED, INC. and MICHAEL JACKSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
MCCRACKEN v. VANIHEL et al
as 2:2024cv00054
Plaintiff:
RICHARD MCCRACKEN
Defendant:
FRANK VANIHEL, CARLA COAKLEY, M. PAYNE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BRIER v. LAMAR et al
as 1:2024cv00092
Plaintiff:
JACOB C. BRIER
Defendant:
AKILAH LAMAR, JACKSON, MCCAFFERTY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FILZEN v. JACKSON et al
as 1:2024cv00259
Plaintiff:
KORRTEL FILZEN
Defendant:
JACKSON and HARRIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SHANNON v. SHAFFER et al
as 1:2024cv00115
Plaintiff:
DANTAVIS LAMARCUS SHANNON
Defendant:
SHAFFER, REGAL, MCCAFFERTY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00200
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
