Cases filed in the US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Cases 11 - 20 of 27
PLUMLEY v. SHELBY COUNTY JAIL
as 1:2020cv03168
Plaintiff: TERRY PLUMLEY
Defendant: SHELBY COUNTY JAIL, JOHN DOE and JANE DOE
Interested Party: SHERIFF BONNER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BONNER v. WARDEN We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2020cv00473
Petitioner: LEE BONNER
Respondent: WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
WHITE v. WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP
as 1:2020cv01194
Plaintiff: KEISHA BONNER WHITE
Defendant: WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP (ALSO INCORRECTLY SUED AS WAL-MART STORES, INC.)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BONNER v. NUTTER et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2020cv00082
Defendant: ROBERT NUTTER, M DOYLE, T. DELFONSO and others
Plaintiff: TEVIN X. BONNER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SERNA v. DUNCAN et al
as 1:2020cv00849
Defendant: MARTIN, POIER, HALL and others
Plaintiff: RONALD SERNA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BONNER v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2019cv04181
Defendant: COOK MEDICAL, LLC, COOK INCORPORATED and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Plaintiff: VICKIE BONNER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BONNER v. COATS et al
as 1:2019cv02406
Defendant: C.I.F. OFFICERS, COATS, GRIFFIN and others
Plaintiff: ANDRE BONNER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WIMBERLY v. FEATHERSTON et al
as 2:2018cv00473
Defendant: MICHELLE ENGLADE, WILLIAM BARLOW, TEXAS REGION EXECUTIVE OFF. and others
Plaintiff: JEREMY WIMBERLY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
CONERLY v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017mc00019
Plaintiff: MICHAEL AARON BONNER, DETRICK CURTIS CONERLY and JOHN MENO CRUZ
Defendant: MS. KATHLEEN KANE, PARAN LLP and TOM WOLF
BONNER et al v. DOAN et al
as 1:2016cv03083
Plaintiff: JOE BONNER and LATONYA BONNER
Defendant: KERRY DOAN and KROWN TRANSPORT, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?