Cases 11 - 20 of 23
THOMAS et al v. LEMMON et al
as 2:2015cv00408
Defendant:
DWAYNE ALSIP, LINDA S. ASHBY, DANIEL ATWOOD and others
Plaintiff:
LEONARD D. THOMAS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
THOMAS v. LEMMON et al
as 2:2015cv00399
Defendant:
DWYANE ALSIP, DANIEL ARNOLD, LINDA ASHBY and others
Plaintiff:
LEONARD THOMAS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KNIGHTEN v. PERSON et al
as 2:2015cv00386
Defendant:
DOTSON, MONICA GIBSON, JESSICA HAMMACH and others
Plaintiff:
UNDRAY KNIGHTEN
Miscellaneou:
WVCF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DOTSON v. KOCH DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
as 3:2015cv00090
Plaintiff:
CHRISTINE DENISE DOTSON
Defendant:
KOCH DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
DOTSON v. USA
as 1:2014cv01648
Petitioner:
STEVEN DOTSON
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
DOTSON v. MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT, INC.
as 1:2014cv00826
Plaintiff:
COURTNEY DOTSON
Defendant:
MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
NOEL-DOTSON v. COAST PROFESSIONAL, INC.
as 1:2013cv00380
Defendant:
COAST PROFESSIONAL, INC.
Plaintiff:
TRACEY NOEL-DOTSON
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
CUNNINGHAM v. TERRE HAUTE POLICE DEPT. et al
as 1:2012cv01279
Defendant:
TERRE HAUTE MAYOR K. BURK, CHIEF OF POLICE, SEG. DOTSON and others
Plaintiff:
RICHARD CUNNINGHAM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DOTSON v. KNIGHT
as 2:2012cv00068
Petitioner:
TONY DOTSON
Respondent:
STANLEY KNIGHT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv01175
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
