Cases 11 - 20 of 24
CARTER v. HAWK
as 1:2019cv01469
Petitioner:
JERMAINE CARTER
Respondent:
HAWK and WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
NEAL v. STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 1:2019cv00790
Defendant:
GOV. STATE OF INDIANA, DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS COMMISSIONER, SHARON HAWK and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID R. NEAL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ARMSTEAD v. GRIFFIN et al
as 1:2018cv02149
Defendant:
MARANDET, WEXFORD HEALTH CARE, KATHY GRIFFIN and others
Plaintiff:
DARREN ARMSTEAD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HAWK v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2017cv04134
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Plaintiff:
DEREK A. HAWK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv00178
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
SMITH v. ANTHONY WAYNE CREDIT ADJUSTERS, INC. et al
as 1:2017cv00026
Defendant:
ANTHONY WAYNE CREDIT ADJUSTERS, INC. and HAWK, HAYNIE, KAMMEYER & SMITH, LLP
Plaintiff:
MARCIA SMITH
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
ANDERSON v. HAWK et al
as 1:2016cv02391
Defendant:
RACHEL ALACANTARA, BARKAS, BELHUEMER and others
Plaintiff:
ANTAEUS ANDERSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HORTON v. GRIFFIN et al
as 1:2016cv01220
Defendant:
KATHY L. GRIFFIN and SHARON HAWK
Plaintiff:
DANNY J. HORTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HENLEY v. LEMMON et al
as 1:2016cv00715
Defendant:
AMY CLARK, SHARON HAWK and BRUCE LEMMON
Plaintiff:
JAMES HENLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CORNETT v. AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY et al
as 1:2014cv00091
Defendant:
AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY and AUSTIN TRI-HAWK AUTOMOTIVE, INC. DISABILITY PLAN
Plaintiff:
VALESSA CORNETT
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
