Cases 11 - 18 of 18
ROBISON v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2016cv01080
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Plaintiff:
PATTIE ROBISON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
ROBISON v. COLVIN
as 1:2014cv01915
Defendant:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Plaintiff:
DORA D. ROBISON
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
IN RE: FAILURE TO COMPLY
as 1:2014mc00052
Respondent:
JONATHAN ROBERT ANDERSON, MAX WAYNE APPLE, JILL MICHELLE ARNOLD and others
In Re:
FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION REQUIREMENTS, NONPAYMENT OF ATTORNEY REGISTRATION FEES, AND/OR FAILURE TO SUBMIT IOLTA CERTIFICATION
ROBISON v. KNIGHT
as 2:2014cv00130
Respondent:
STANLEY KNIGHT
Petitioner:
MELVIN ROBISON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JESSEE v. CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS et al
as 1:2014cv00064
Defendant:
ANONYMOUS MEDICAL PROFESSIONAL, CLINTON BENNETT, JUSTIN BUCHANAN and others
Plaintiff:
KATHERINE F. JESSEE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
ROBISON v. WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP
as 4:2008cv00215
Plaintiff:
CARLYN ROBISON and CARLYN ROBISON
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv00164
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
JUDSON ATKINSON CANDIES, INC. v. KENRAY ASSOCIATES INC et al
as 4:2003cv00012
Counter Defendant:
DR. B. E. ATKINSON, JR. and JUDSON ATKINSON CANDIES, INC.
Third Party Defendant:
Dr. BASIL E. ATKINSON, Jr.
Plaintiff:
JUDSON ATKINSON CANDIES, INC.
Counter Claimant:
KENRAY ASSOCIATES INC, CHARLES A. MC GEE and KENNETH J. MC GEE
Defendant:
KENRAY ASSOCIATES INC, CHARLES A. MC GEE and KENNETH J. MC GEE
812)945-3618 (fax:
Stanley E. Robison, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
