Cases 21 - 30 of 58
RIDDLE et al v. RYAN et al
as 1:2019cv01263
Plaintiff:
DAWN RIDDLE and MATT RIDDLE
Defendant:
SYED J KHAN, NICOLE M RYAN, RETA K BOWEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BOWENS v. BERRYHILL
as 1:2018cv03882
Plaintiff:
GWANDEL D. BOWENS
Defendant:
NANCY A. BERRYHILL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv03696
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
HECK v. BOWEN et al
as 1:2018cv02939
Plaintiff:
SARA HECK and SARA MARIE HECK
Defendant:
COMMANDER JASON SLODERBECK, SHERIFF MARK BOWEN, MARK BOWEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COZATT v. STEIN et al
as 1:2018cv02456
Defendant:
ALLEN REID, ANGELA SWENSON, CODY COGSWELL and others
Plaintiff:
TRACY COZATT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HEGWOOD v. INDIANA PAROLE BOARD MEMBERS et al
as 1:2018cv02281
Defendant:
CHRIS TANIS, MR. BUTTS, INDIANA PAROLE BOARD MEMBERS and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL A. HEGWOOD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BOWEN v. COOK MEDICAL, LLC et al
as 1:2018cv00483
Plaintiff:
MARGARET BOWEN
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL, LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BOWEN v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2017cv04448
Plaintiff:
KATHLEEN M. BOWEN
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BOWENS v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2017cv04229
Plaintiff:
JEROME A. BOWENS
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BOWEN v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2017cv03459
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM G. BOWEN
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
